THE FINAL VERDICT: Obama Is An Enemy To America – Suggests Shocking Report

The Daily Pen

A new report authored by Western Journalism Center senior research fellow,
Stephen Baldwin exposes vast and widespread corruption within the Obama
administration. The report presents evidence which directly confronts the
liberal establishment, led by Obama’s radical agenda and pervasive attempts to
undermine America’s powerful standing by devaluing vintage American heritage and
by rejecting the reality of American exceptionalism.

Among the measures
implicated to this end are the Obama administation’s covert implementation of
socialism through wealth redistribution legislation; The expansion of government
control over private industry; The empowerment of entitlement based policies for
minorities; Government supported racial bias against whites and overt deficit
spending intended to burden affluent American tax payers to the point of crisis
thereby devaluing American currency and forcing massive internationalization of
the American financial system.

Baldwin’s “The Case for
Impeachment: Why Barack Hussein Obama Should be Impeached to Save
America”
covers several troubling issues about the conduct of the Obama
adminstration.

The report explains the fundamental problem facing America
today as an insidious, passive allowance of the destruction of our sovereignty
at the hands of perverted liberals and violent religionist
extremists.

“Basically, its vintage American heritage against the world,”
says Queens University, College of Social and Political Science’s, Dr. Alvis
Meachum, “This is about the melanic world’s unjustifiable hatred and jealousy of
America’s economic and social exceptionalism along with a disparate rejection of
the perpetuity of Christian faith by vast numbers of its citizens.”

The
origins of this problem are deeply rooted in our denial of the preciousness of
our blood-ransomed freedom and in our lack of principled adherence to the
foundational, Christian values upon which America was established. America’s
power was endowed through the covenantal prescriptions of Judeo-Christian faith
in the Highest authority, Who is Christ, which is greater than any powers of
man’s government in this world.

Unfortunately, we have forgotten our
vintage American heroes. We have abandoned their memory. We have forgotten the
sacrifice of those worthier…

Most tragically, we have rejected God, and
His Son, Jesus Christ, Who loved us first.

“This report reveals a pattern
that demonstrates Obama is constantly engaging in actions that reflect a
hard-left ideology antithetical to America’s founding principles. … Obama is
clearly dismissive of America’s constitutional principles and obviously dislikes
the role America plays in the world. He dislikes our Judeo-Christian heritage
and detests America’s historical allies.”

The report
continues:

“Less than halfway through his first term, Obama has done more
damage to America than any previous president in history. Some of the damage can
be repaired; some can’t. Some of his policies will haunt generations to come,”
the report says. “It’s time for the American people to rise up and demand
Congress impeach him.”

The report cites a specific account when Obama
even altered the established record of history in order to remove Christian
references:

“In his 2010 Easter greeting message, Obama quoted from a
sermon given by a military pastor on Iwo Jima in 1945. However, he removed
passages dealing with Christian doctrine – like Christ’s resurrection – in order
to make the quote appealing to all religions, even though Easter is NOT a
multicultural event; it’s a Christian event. Obama altered a great historical
quote in order to serve his multicultural worldview. Apparently he is
embarrassed by America’s Christian heritage.”

The account also addresses
specific misconduct deeply rooted in the Obama administration’s ideological
contempt for ethics and American law.

Among the accounts addressed in the
report are:

1. Obama’s violations of federal campaign and ethics
laws
, including the offers from his administration to Democratic U.S. Rep.
Joe Sestak, who reported he was offered a high-ranking government job to drop
his opposition in the Pennsylvania Senate primary to sitting Sen. Arlen
Specter.

These violations began as early as 2006 when Obama violated the
Logan Act by campaigning for his “cousin”, Raila Odinga, a communist
presidential candidate in Kenya, which essentially influenced the outcome of the
foreign election. Obama’s participation was a blatant violation of American law.
The election resulted in a loss for Odinga who immediately filed an appeal with
the Kenyan Election Ministry. The appeal was followed by weeks of violent
protest which resulted in the brutal murder of hundreds of Christians and the
burning of hundreds of non-muslim churches.

The violence essentially
spurred a legislative revision of the 40 year old Kenyan Constitution to add a
new prime ministerial position in order to include Odinga in the Kenyan
government.

It has since been discovered that Odinga entered into an
agreement with Kenya’s leading Muslim organization prior to the election,
promising fundamental changes to legislative processes meant to favor Muslim
doctrine in government including a push for the implementation of Sharia law, a
legal system based on the Muslim religious doctrine outlined in the
Koran.

2. Obama’s Corruption of Municipal Political Process.
Supported by Obama’s effort “…to persuade the [Illinois] governor, Rod
Blagojovich, to fill the vacated Senate seat with his longtime adviser Valerie
Jarrett.”

Blago has since been tried and convicted on only one of 27
federal indictments, a remedial charge of lying to federal authorities. This
astonishing verdict was no doubt a direct result of Blago’s threat to testify
during trial and expose high ranking members of the Obama administration in
their complicity with the crimes committed by the Chicago regime. No time will
ever be served by Blago as a “reward” arranged with federal prosecutors, who
were undoubtedly influenced by Obama, after Blago’s decision to forego
testifying.

3. Illegal Acceptance of Foreign Political
Contributions.
Suggestions from Obama’s own Federal Election Commission
documentation that he got at least $33.8 million for his campaign from
disallowed foreign contributions, including 520 contributions from interests in
Iran as well as $30,000 from the Hamas-controlled Gaza area.

4.
Obama’s Corruption of the American Justice System. This is supported by
the fact that the administration made a decision to drop a case that prosecutors
already had won against “black nationalist thugs” who were seen on
video apparently intimidating voters during the 2008 election.

A
Department of Justice lawyer has since resigned after he was allegedly told by
the supervisors of the Civil Law division that the government would not
prosecute any cases of alleged election fraud “…when the plaintiff was white and
the defendant was black.”

5. Obama’s Abuse of Executive Power.
Obama fired an inspector general, Gerald Walpin, after he exposed corruption
linked to one of Obama’s buddies, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson.

6.
The president’s system of rewarding supporters has come under question.
The report confirms more than 70 individuals who raised $50,000 or more for
Obama “have been rewarded with ambassadorships or high ranking jobs.

This
is what happens when you deny the most basic principles of rightness and
decency. By default, an illegitimate, ineligible radical will fill the void and
assume control of power and wield it to exploit, pervert and
enslave.

However, there are other prolific, more “organic” reasons which
provide direct insight into the vast liberal pathology propagating from this
regime. These reasons begin with the seeds of Obama’s very existence:

7.
A Lack of Confirmation of Legal Constitutional Eligibility. The
Founders of America understood better than anyone how the sovereignty of America
and, thus, national security could be compromised by a failure to uphold the
integrity of our leadership, from “conception to election”. The monarchal
government, against whom our Founders fought for independence, was vastly
corrupted by a lack of sovereignty in its hierarchy. This was caused mainly by
intermarriage with the families of foreign rulers and a lack of boundaries
between the political, religious, legal and social factions within the British
ruling class. The corruption of British leadership by foreign political, social
and religious powers created tyranny which forced freedom loving citizens to
unify in a violent revolution and declare their own independence.

It is
also unarguable that America’s Founders sought to protect America’s political
and military security by establishing a sovereign presidency. This was sought in
order to prevent influence by foreign interests or manipulations through the
extortion of a President’s plural heritage, or through political blackmail of a
President’s foreign loyalties.

It is clear that Barack Obama has not
thoroughly disclosed adequate information proving his compliance with all of the
Constitutional eligibility mandates to be President. It is widely accepted that
Obama meets two of the three mandates for Constitutional eligibility. He was
older than 35 and he had resided in the U.S. for 14 years prior to the 2008
election. However, there are legitimate, unanswered questions, stemming from a
lack of common evidence, about BOTH his Natural Born and legal U.S. citizenship,
as discussed below.

8. A Lack of Federal U.S. Natal
Documentation.
Establishing one’s natal identity and/or legal citizenship
status is an essential requirement for most Americans for various reasons. Some
of these reasons include providing identification for obtaining a driver’s
license, registering for school, applying for a job, applying for a passport,
applying for a loan, applying for a marriage license or applying for a
professional license. Many of America’s licensures simply require the applicant
to be a legally registered citizen of the U.S. This means that the individual
could have been born outside of the United States and then became a “legal”
citizen of the U.S. by applying for citizenship through our U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service. This form of citizenship is not Natural Born.

The
office of the Presidency is a federal office, not a local (city or county) or
municipal (State) office. Therefore, in America, we have a federal documentation
process used to confirm the status of eligibility for our federal office
holders. This federal documentation includes the long accepted, historically
approved document used to prove natural born natal identity. It is the federal,
U.S. Department of Health’s “Certificate of Live Birth” published through
formatting standards set by the National Vital Statistics Division (NVSD) and
created in close collaboration with standards established by the National
Conference on Records and Statistics. This document’s form and function was
first established in its functional form around 1915 as an improved method of
collecting data and information for Census and Natality data in the U.S.
developed.

The four notable revisions in the document’s life cycle
occurred in 1915, 1933, 1946 and 1956. Since it was formally adopted as a
Standard Certificate in 1956, the NVSD “Certificate of Live Birth” has been the
exclusive form of documentation published at the time of any live birth event
which adequately confirms, with absolute certainty, a “Natural Born” citizen of
the U.S. The NVSD Certificate of Live Birth determines a child’s Natural Born
identity with six (6) specific metrics.

a. The geographical location
of the birth in the U.S., or in a location under the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Constitutional protections, including the name of the facility and/or physical
address of the birth location.
b. The citizenship of the mother established
by either providing the location of her birth or documentation of legal
citizenship in the U.S.
c. The date of birth of the child and at least one
parent, preferably the mother.
d. The citizenship of the Father established
by either providing the location of his birth or documentation of legal
citizenship in the U.S.
e. The name, signature and license information of the
official attendant of the birth (usually a physician, practician, midwife or
medical official qualified to testify to the occurrence of a living or
non-living birth event. If the birth does not occur in the presence of a
licensed medical professional, witness testimony is taken from those present at
the birth and attested as fact by a doctor at the soonest possible
opportunity.
f. The registration of the birth with a municipal agency charged
by the federal government with the responsibility of recording, collecting,
storing and reporting vital information and data to the federal departments of
Health and Vital Statistics.

Since 1915, the “Certification of Live
Birth” template underwent refinements, revisions and contextual changes as data
reporting standards formalized, but there has never been a reduction in the
amount of essential data. The essential and preeminent purpose of the NVSD
“Certificate of Live Birth” was to provide the most complete, most thorough,
most accurate information possible about births in the U.S. As time progressed
and our population grew and became more diverse, each state made various minor
changes in order to accommodate local laws protecting privacy. However, the
spirit of the federal documentation process for births in the U.S. has never
changed and has always conformed to the federal standard since as early as 1850
when the first census was attempted.

If any individual fails to produce
this documentation, it is reasonable, and encouraged of government officials, to
doubt their Natural Born identity.

9. A Lack of Verification of
Immigration Activity and Documented Legalized U.S. Citizenship.
There is a
difference between legalized U.S. citizenship and Natural Born citizenship.
Natural born citizenship is obtained by no other means except being born under
specific natal circumstances, as previously discussed. Legalized U.S.
citizenship is achieved through legal and administrative processes undertaken by
non-citizen’s application for U.S. citizenship.

On March 25th, 1965,
Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, married an Indonesian man named Lolo Soetoro.
Recent images of court documents show that Dunham was granted a divorce from
Barack Obama Sr. on March 20th, 1964. In 1967, Barack Obama moved to Indonesia
with his mother where he allegedly became an Indonesian citizen through his
adoption by Mr. Soetoro. He attended two schools there and was registered under
the name “Barry Soetoro”.

In 1967, Indonesia was under restrictive laws
essentially making it a closed society. This means that immigration laws in
Indonesia at the time of Obama’s residence there restricted the circumstances by
which a citizen of another country could attend school in Indonesia. Primarily,
Indonesian law prohibited dual citizenship which would have required that Obama
become a full, legalized citizen of Indonesia in order to attend school there
until 1971.

As reported by World Net Daily on August 5,
2010:

“Barack Obama lived in Indonesia for “over three years by that
time,” discussing a visit with his mother to the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta at an
unspecified time before he returned to the U.S. (Source: Dreams from My Father,
p. 30).

“In Indonesia, I had spent two years at a Muslim school, two
years at the Catholic school” (Source: “Dreams from My Father,” p.
154).

Obama was in Indonesia from the time he was 6 years old until age
10, from 1967 to 1971.
On an unspecified date in 1971: Barack Obama returns
from Indonesia to Hawaii alone, unaccompanied by his mother (Source: “Dreams
from My Father,” p. 53).

Obama asserts he hands his grandparents his U.S.
passport upon arrival in Honolulu (Source: Dreams from My Father, p.
54).

Nothing in the released Freedom of Information State Department
documents indicates Dunham Soetoro assisted her son in obtaining a U.S. passport
in Indonesia after she amended her passport to remove his name.

To date,
Obama has refused to release to the U.S. public his State Department passport
records and international travel documentation.”

The four most shocking
facts challenging Obama’s identity are:

a. Obama has never provided a
verifiable, Federal version of a 1961 long-form, traditional U.S. Department of
Health, National Vital Statistic Division “Certificate of Live Birth”
which would have been issued to him through the physician of the hospital, if he
were indeed born in the U.S. There is no escaping the conviction of this
document for Obama. This document would reveal the complete information required
to determine whether Obama is a Natural Born citizen, or not and it would verify
all other circumstances, demographics and metrics of his identity at
birth.
b. Obama’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., was not a U.S. citizen.
c.
Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was too young to confer her U.S. citizenship
to Obama thereby defaulting the establishment of citizenry to that of his
father’s, who was a British citizen from Kenya. The laws in affect at the time
of Obama’s birth stipulated that if a child was born to only one parent who was
a citizen of the U.S., that parent had to have resided in the U.S. for at least
10 years, 5 years of which had to be after the citizen parent’s 14th Birthday.
Ann Dunham was only 18 when Obama was born making her ineligible to pass
American citizenship to Obama. Therefore, Obama was born a British citizen, like
his father.
d. Obama became a citizen of Indonesia in 1967. Today, there is
no evidence available to prove Obama applied for and actually became a legal
U.S. citizen upon returning to Hawaii in 1971.

10. A Lack of
Verification of Obama’s Legal Name.
Obama has used more than one name in
his life. However, there is no legal chain of documentation verifying when or
where he ever changed his name.

Obviously, Obama was born with a name
given to him by his parents. However, no official, Federal or legal document has
been provided to clarify what name Obama was given at birth.

Sometime
after his mother’s marriage to Lolo Soetoro, Obama began using the name Barry
Soetoro, which has been shown occurring in various sources from his school
registration to labels on photographs to testimony from people who knew him
during these years.

Then, sometime after he graduated from High School,
Obama began using his current name “Barack Obama” as evidence shows in pictures
and alleged documentation.

There is no Federal or legal documentation
showing when or where Obama changed his name from his birth name (whatever that
was) to Barry Soetoro, and then to Barack Hussein Obama. We might assume he was
born with the name Barack Obama based on conjecture, but the fact of the matter
is that we do not have legal documentation proving this.

11. Obama’s
Use of Multiple Social Security Numbers.
Obama has been accused of
violating U.S. law by investigators who uncovered solid evidence that he has
used multiple social security numbers throughout his life. When confronted with
this evidence, White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs has simply refused to answer
legitimate questions while accusing anyone asking about this serious legal
matter of being a conspiracist against Obama.

Notably, a spokesperson
from the U.S. Attorney General’s office, led by Obama appointee, Eric Holder,
has said that if anyone else in America had been confronted with the evidence
Obama had been confronted with, they would have been indicted on charges of
identity fraud.

12. Obama’s Political Plurality and His Blatant
Connections With Foreign Interests.
There are multiple accounts of Obama
seeking political support from foreign heads of state and governments who have
consistently violated U.N. security council regulations.

The most recent
account was Obama’s refusal to support the uprising of citizens of Iran in their
protest against the fraudulently elected government of Mahmoud Amadinijad, who
has repeatedly threatened Israel and America and has since achieved nuclear
capability which the Muslim procaustic says is to be used for utility purposes
only. Iran is a persistent violator of demands and sanctions implemented by
global security officials and continues to incite anti-Semitic hatred for
Israel.

13. The Complicity In Obama’s Deception By the Government of
the State Of Hawaii.
Since the 2008 election, thousands of requests have
been made by the American people for that states cooperation in providing
documentation of Obama’s identity for the purpose of verifying his eligibility
to be president.

Many employees and elected officials of the government of the State of Hawaii, including Governor, Linda Lingle, the director of the Hawaiian Department of Health, Chiyome Fukino and the State Registrar, the DOH Communications Officer and several election officials have all engaged in highly irregular, suspect behavior and highly ambiguous testimony seemingly contrived for the illicit purpose of protecting Obama’s covert identity and concealing the circumstances of his murky natal history. At the center of the controversy is the state of Hawaii’s strange willfulness to promote Obama’s eligibility through secondary testimony without actually providing the original, official, federal records it has on file containing personal, biographical, natal and demographic information about Obama’s alleged birth and residence in the Hawaii islands since 1961.

It has since been learned that Governor Lingle has been a
long-time advocate of economic partnerships with the nation of Indonesia, one of
Obama’s geographic origins from where little information has been provided about
his residency, travel and activity there.

Lingle traveled to Indonesia in
June of 2007, immediately following the controversy surrounding Obama’s Hawaiian
certification of Live birth, and subsequent questions about his Indonesian and
Kenyan roots. Lingle’s stated purpose in Indonesia was to promote economic
opportunities between Hawaii and the Muslim south pacific island nation. She
also spoke at the joint Hawaiian-Indonesian Chamber of Commerce in June, 2010.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1Nu1H6qtLQ

Regarding
the 2007 Indonesian trip, the Governor’s own website states:

“The
first leg of the trip will include a three-day visit to Jakarta to inaugurate a
Hawai‘i-Indonesia State Partnership with the Hawai‘i National Guard in support
of PACOM’s security cooperation strategy. The partnership program will offer
opportunities for increased cooperation in the areas of mutual security
cooperation, disaster preparedness, trade, education and
tourism.


Governor Lingle will meet with Indonesia’s minister of
defense and other cabinet members, as well as representatives of the U.S.
Embassy. She will also participate in a roundtable discussion with the
Indonesian Center for Security & International Services and the
U.S.-Indonesia Society, tour the Indonesia Earthquake and Tsunami Research
Center, and visit with U.S. forces participating in a disaster management
exercise. In addition, she will meet with Indonesian women leaders and
participate in an interactive conference.”

The Governor will be
accompanied by members of the Administration who will take part in various
segments of the trip, including Major General Robert Lee, state adjutant
general; Marsha Wienert, state tourism liaison; Dr. Chiyome Fukino,
state health director;
Sandra Lee Kunimoto, chair, Board of
Agriculture; Kurt Kawafuchi, state tax director; JP Schmidt, state insurance
commissioner; Craig Watanabe, captive insurance administrator, Department of
Commerce and Consumer Affairs; Lenny Klompus, senior advisor-communications;
Russell Pang, chief of media relations; and representatives from the Department
of Business, Economic Development and Tourism.”

It is highly
irregular for a State official, like Lingle, to engage in international
political, business and security affairs on behalf of America on an
international level without participation of the federal government.

On
many occasions, Lingle has expressed a bias in her relationship with the people
in Obama’s former foreign homeland where he lived with his mother, half sister
and late stepfather, Lolo Soetoro.

14. The Federal Court System is
Protecting Obama.
Federal court judges have rejected more than 30
legitimate cases filed against Obama seeking evidence of his presidential
eligibility.

15. Obama’s Racially Biased Sentiments in Favor of
Minorities Against Whites.
Throughout his presidency Obama has made
unnecessary comments about racial issues. In no instance of alleged conflict
along racial lines, has Obama ever spoke objectively in favor of unity. He has
persistently taken the side of the non-white party involved while, on some
occasions, actually disparaging the white people involved.

The most
notable example of this was Obama’s comment that white Cambridge police officers
acted stupidly in arresting Obama’s friend and former Harvard affiliate, Henry
Louis Gates after Gates was charged with disorderly conduct and acting in a
threatening manner against the police. Before Obama’s stupid comments, he even
admitted that he did not know the facts of the case, yet, he commented on it
anyway.

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s